In the ongoing Panini vs. Fanatics lawsuit, I find myself deeply concerned about the implications of any company having an exclusive monopoly on an entire sport. While I understand the need for sports leagues to secure lucrative partnerships and licensing deals, it's essential to strike a balance between financial gain and the interests of collectors, fans, and the overall health of the sports memorabilia market.
Exclusivity agreements, like the one between Fanatics and major sports leagues, can potentially stifle competition and limit consumer choice. This exclusivity gives one entity unchecked control over the production and distribution of sports cards, potentially leading to higher prices, reduced product innovation, and limited access for collectors.
Collecting sports cards has been a beloved hobby for generations, and it's essential to preserve the diversity and vibrancy of the marketplace. Competition among different card manufacturers has historically driven innovation, improved quality, and ensured a variety of options for collectors. It has allowed for unique sets, rare inserts, and different approaches to card design, catering to a wide range of tastes within the hobby.
An exclusive license may also limit the accessibility of sports cards, particularly for smaller manufacturers or newcomers to the industry who bring fresh ideas and innovation. Furthermore, it may negatively impact the secondary market, where collectors buy, sell, and trade cards among themselves, potentially creating uncertainty about the future value of their collections.
In my opinion, a healthy sports memorabilia market is one where collectors have choices, and competition fuels creativity and innovation. While I recognize the financial benefits of exclusive licensing agreements for sports leagues and card manufacturers, it's crucial to strike a balance that ensures the long-term vitality of the hobby and the interests of collectors.
Ultimately, the Panini vs. Fanatics lawsuit raises essential questions about the impact of exclusivity on the sports card collecting community. It's a conversation that deserves thoughtful consideration, with the goal of preserving the rich history and diversity of the sports card collecting world.
we have all been saying he will be lucky to break 7 figures.. the market is down, and while this is only numbered to 23, there are still hundreds in slabs certified, in higher grades.
I hate the new plastic logomen on the jersey's.. The threaded patch ones look so much nicer. Hoping to pull a Cade Cunningham RPA of some sort out of this years release though
Once again , Panini not giving a crap about quality control, they could have taken an extra 10 seconds out of their day to make sure the shield's are centered.. and how about a bigger window for them so you can see the whole shield.. trash once again.
Exclusivity agreements, like the one between Fanatics and major sports leagues, can potentially stifle competition and limit consumer choice. This exclusivity gives one entity unchecked control over the production and distribution of sports cards, potentially leading to higher prices, reduced product innovation, and limited access for collectors.
Collecting sports cards has been a beloved hobby for generations, and it's essential to preserve the diversity and vibrancy of the marketplace. Competition among different card manufacturers has historically driven innovation, improved quality, and ensured a variety of options for collectors. It has allowed for unique sets, rare inserts, and different approaches to card design, catering to a wide range of tastes within the hobby.
An exclusive license may also limit the accessibility of sports cards, particularly for smaller manufacturers or newcomers to the industry who bring fresh ideas and innovation. Furthermore, it may negatively impact the secondary market, where collectors buy, sell, and trade cards among themselves, potentially creating uncertainty about the future value of their collections.
In my opinion, a healthy sports memorabilia market is one where collectors have choices, and competition fuels creativity and innovation. While I recognize the financial benefits of exclusive licensing agreements for sports leagues and card manufacturers, it's crucial to strike a balance that ensures the long-term vitality of the hobby and the interests of collectors.
Ultimately, the Panini vs. Fanatics lawsuit raises essential questions about the impact of exclusivity on the sports card collecting community. It's a conversation that deserves thoughtful consideration, with the goal of preserving the rich history and diversity of the sports card collecting world.